Xiaoyin Yang vs Linang Xiao Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 13 Aug at 06:49 AM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

X. Yang vs L. Xiao

Xiaoyin Yang
Xiaoyin Yang

Flag CHN CHN

w
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
Linang Xiao
Linang Xiao

Flag CHN CHN

l
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

20
Age
25
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
781
0
Best Rank
637
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$13.5K
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Yang 1 - 0 Xiao

They have played 2 sets in total, with Xiaoyin Yang winning 2 and Linang Xiao winning 0. The last match between Xiaoyin Yang and Linang Xiao was at the M25 Yinchuan, 13-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Xiaoyin Yang getting the victory 6-2 6-3.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Yang1
Xiao0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1M25 Yinchuan(08-13-25)

Hard
CHN Flag
Xiaoyin Yang
6
6
CHN Flag
Linang Xiao
2
3

X. Yang vs L. Xiao H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$13,500
53.85% (28-24)Career Total W/L55.45% (117-94)
1Hard0
0Titles1
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

X. Yang vs L. Xiao Match Preview:

  • Recent form shows Xiao has a slight edge in second serve effectiveness, winning 46.83% of points compared to Yang's 44.74%. Could this impact the overall match outcome?
  • Examining return games, Xiao is more adept at winning points on both their opponent's first and second serves, especially notable with a 27.16% success on first serve returns versus Yang's 18.45%.
  • Under pressure, Xiao excels in saving breakpoints, managing a 53.48% save rate, while Yang comes in at a lower 36.36%.
  • Yearly performance comparison shows Yang having a slightly higher win rate at 54.55% compared to Xiao's 48.98%. Does this hint at better overall performance?
  • Yang performs best on hard courts with a 55% win rate, while Xiao thrives on clay with 62%. Surface preference could play a critical role.
  • When comparing the event level, Xiao has faced lower-ranked opponents on average, playing against those ranked around 460, while Yang's opponents averaged a rank of 57.18.
  • Deciding set prowess significantly favors Yang, who has won all deciding sets in the past year, compared to Xiao's 50% success rate.
  • In terms of break point conversion, Yang is more effective, converting 50% of opportunities, whereas Xiao converts 37.39%.

Editorial Prediction (August 13, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match presents a contest between Yang's consistent match performance and Xiao's refined skills under pressure.

Xiao's strength in the return game and ability to save breakpoints might prove advantageous during critical points in the match. However, Yang's superiority in converting break point opportunities offers a counterbalance, suggesting a potential edge during crucial junctures.

Surface preference also plays a pivotal role as Yang performs best on hard surfaces, where this match is likely to be held, while Xiao prefers clay. This may favor Yang in the current setting.

Overall, combining Yang's capacity to succeed in deciding sets with their experience against tougher opponents, Yang appears to be a slightly stronger contender in this match, potentially leading them to victory.

Xiaoyin Yang vs Linang Xiao Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

X. Yang vs L. Xiao H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won5
12Aces (Total)1
4Total Double Faults8
1:10:49Average Match Time1:10:49
60% (31/52)1st Serve %56% (27/48)
90% (28/31)1st Serve Win %78% (21/27)
52% (11/21)2nd Serve Win %43% (9/21)
33% (3/9)Break Pts Won %0% (0/1)
38% (18/48)Return Points Win %25% (13/52)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Yang 38%, Xiao 53%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Yang 47%, Xiao 51%.
Break Points Saved %: Yang 61%, Xiao 57%.

X. Yang Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardM25 Qian Daohu - 27-10-2025

R1

CHNY. Cong
L
7-6(1) 6-4

Q3

TPEK. Wang
W
6-3 4-6 10-6

Q1

INDC. Shivaraj
W
6-1 7-5
HardM25 Huzhou - 20-10-2025

R1

CHNQ. Sun
L
6-3 6-2
HardM25 Guiyang - 15-09-2025

R1

TPET. Huang
L
6-2 6-3

L. Xiao Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardM25 Huzhou - 20-10-2025

R2

CHNQ. Sun
L
6-3 4-6 7-6(2)

R1

CHNR. Huang
W
6-3 6-3
HardShenzhen Challenger - 13-10-2025

Q1

CHNX. Wang
L
6-3 6-3
HardJinan Challenger - 06-10-2025

Q3

RUSP. Bar
L
6-2 6-4

Q1

AUSO. Jasika
W
6-2 6-4
banner

X. Yang vs L. Xiao Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
53.85% (28/24)YTD Win/Loss55.45% (117/94)
52.17% (60/55)Sets Win/Loss55.36% (258/208)
50.64% (598/583)Games Win/Loss53.18% (2289/2015)
56.10% (23/18)Hard Win/Loss55.14% (102/83)
20.00% (1/4)Clay Win/Loss61.54% (8/5)
66.67% (4/2)Indoor Hard W/L53.85% (7/6)
0.32Aces Per Game0.16
185Aces Total342
0.17Double Faults Per Game0.15
96Total Double Faults307
1st MatchAverage Match Time1:10:41
130.15Average Opponent Rank371.29
59% (1162/1960)1st Serve %58% (5427/9420)
72% (839/1162)1st Serve Win %66% (3567/5427)
42% (336/798)2nd Serve Win %51% (2035/3993)
40% (60/150)Break Points Won % (Total)41% (411/1014)
35% (631/1819)Return Points Win %41% (3884/9567)
0% (0/0)Masters W/L25.00% (1/3)
0% (0/0)Main Tour W/L0.00% (0/2)
0% (0/0)Challenger W/L36.36% (12/21)
53.85% (28/24)Futures W/L60.47% (104/68)
54% (28/52)Best of 3 Sets Win %55% (112/202)
0% (0/0)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/2)
44% (4/9)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)52% (26/50)
64% (7/11)Deciding Set Win %44% (22/50)
89% (27/24)1st Set Won, Won Match88% (120/105)
11% (27/3)1st Set Won, Lost Match12% (120/14)
16% (25/4)1st Set Lost, Won Match9% (90/8)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

10:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction
ITAS. Travaglia
CROM. Dodig
W1
1.89
W2
1.79
12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
AUTS. Sorger
KAZD. Yevseyev
W1
2.4
W2
1.49
05:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction
JPNK. Nishikori1
JPNT. Ichikawaq
W1
1.184
W2
4.15
02:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction
AUSJ. Duckworth1
AUSM. Bouzige
W1
1.071
W2
6.5
12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
ITAS. NapolitanoPR
FINO. Virtanen3
W1
3.84
W2
1.21
10:57 PM 17/11/25
Prediction
KAZD. Popko4
BRAM. Alves
W1
1.84
W2
1.84